First of all I cursed the career with the changes that started in 2016, so I would say that my generation are objects of testing because we are the first in try the “changes” but I put the changes between quotation marks considering that we have not perceived in the first instance the changes, it's supposed to would be good for us respect to the workload, but happened the opposite. For example in the first year we had to sleep at university to make homework, I think the main reason is the no communication between the teachers and also is related to the ego of every teacher because they left us a lot of homework like as if we had one subject. I think that the real change is to consult the student community or make some regulated mechanism to make validated the opinion of all the students.
About the infrastructure is part important for the good formation of any student of architecture, because is the career that requires more material tools, basically we have to make constantly group works and practical work. And if we consider that we spend most of the time into university maybe they should be to offers us spaces more worthy and comfortable. And other point is the fault of more workspaces, before to incorporate more students.
And the point most important for me is change the way teachers come in, I know that are a competition before to accept any teacher but this is not enough, being the success and good job in a professional area is not the same thing that be a good teacher.
Be the first generation with a new curriculum sucks, always things go wrong.
ResponderBorrar